# host-bridge (Phase 0) A host-side Python bridge that connects to one radio per network — Meshtastic, MeshCore, and Reticulum (via an RNode-flashed board) — over each project's **official** client protocol, and relays text messages between all three. See `../docs/ARCHITECTURE.md` for why this is Phase 0 (prove the cross-network translation logic on 3 separate boards, no custom firmware) rather than Phase 1 (one time-multiplexed radio on a single Heltec V3). ## Status **Written, not yet hardware-tested.** Every library call has been checked against the upstream project's actual source/docs (see comments in each `adapters/*.py` file for what was verified and how), and all four dependencies (`meshtastic`, `meshcore`, `rns`, `lxmf`) install and import cleanly. What's unverified is the actual on-air behavior once real radios are attached — that requires the three boards described below. ## What you need to test this for real - A Meshtastic-flashed board (e.g. Heltec V3) connected via USB serial or reachable over TCP (ESP32 WiFi build) - A MeshCore companion-radio-flashed board, serial or TCP - An RNode-flashed board (any RNode-compatible LoRa board) reachable via RNS's serial interface — configure this the same way archy's own `core/archipelago/src/mesh/reticulum.rs` KISS interface does, since this bridge uses the standard `rns`/`lxmf` Python packages, not a custom implementation - All three radios need actual antennas/RF range to each other's respective real-world networks to see any traffic worth relaying — this is not simulatable without a radio in the loop ## Install ```bash python3 -m venv venv source venv/bin/activate pip install -r requirements.txt ``` ## Run ```bash python3 main.py \ --meshtastic-port /dev/ttyUSB0 \ --meshcore-port /dev/ttyUSB1 \ --reticulum-storage ./rns-storage ``` Use `--meshtastic-host`/`--meshcore-host` instead of the `-port` flags if a board is reachable over TCP (e.g. an ESP32 WiFi build) instead of USB serial. Run `python3 main.py --help` for the full flag list. ## How relaying works Each adapter pushes received text onto a shared, thread-safe queue (`bridge_core.MessageBus`). A single dispatcher loop in `main.py` pulls each message off, tags it with its origin network + sender, and re-sends it on the other two networks — never back onto the network it came from. Content-hash dedup (`MessageBus.is_duplicate`, 5-minute TTL by default) stops the obvious relay loop (the bridge re-hearing its own relayed copy). This is a known-simple v0 approach — it can't distinguish two different messages that happen to have identical text within the TTL window, and it doesn't help if there are *multiple* archy-messh bridges active near each other. Good enough to prove the concept; revisit once Phase 1 needs something more robust. ## Known gaps (by design, for v0) - **Reticulum has no broadcast-channel primitive.** Meshtastic has channel PSKs, MeshCore has public channel indices — Reticulum/LXMF messaging is point-to-point between Destinations. `ReticulumAdapter` fakes broadcast by tracking a roster of peer delivery-destinations learned from their LXMF announces and fanning out to all of them individually. A shared symmetric-key Reticulum `GROUP` destination would be a closer analog to a real channel — noted as a follow-up, not implemented here. - **MeshCore channel messages carry no sender identity at the protocol level** (verified against `meshcore/reader.py` — `CHANNEL_MSG_RECV` has no pubkey/name field). MeshCore apps convey sender identity by convention inside the message text itself; this bridge doesn't attempt to parse that out, so messages relayed *from* MeshCore show `?` as the sender.