host-bridge (Phase 0)
A host-side Python bridge that connects to one radio per network —
Meshtastic, MeshCore, and Reticulum (via an RNode-flashed board) — over
each project's official client protocol, and relays text messages
between all three. See ../docs/ARCHITECTURE.md for why this is Phase 0
(prove the cross-network translation logic on 3 separate boards, no
custom firmware) rather than Phase 1 (one time-multiplexed radio on a
single Heltec V3).
Status
Written, not yet hardware-tested. Every library call has been checked
against the upstream project's actual source/docs (see comments in each
adapters/*.py file for what was verified and how), and all four
dependencies (meshtastic, meshcore, rns, lxmf) install and import
cleanly. What's unverified is the actual on-air behavior once real radios
are attached — that requires the three boards described below.
What you need to test this for real
- A Meshtastic-flashed board (e.g. Heltec V3) connected via USB serial or reachable over TCP (ESP32 WiFi build)
- A MeshCore companion-radio-flashed board, serial or TCP
- An RNode-flashed board (any RNode-compatible LoRa board) reachable via RNS's serial interface — configure this the same way archy's own
core/archipelago/src/mesh/reticulum.rsKISS interface does, since this bridge uses the standardrns/lxmfPython packages, not a custom implementation - All three radios need actual antennas/RF range to each other's respective real-world networks to see any traffic worth relaying — this is not simulatable without a radio in the loop
Install
python3 -m venv venv
source venv/bin/activate
pip install -r requirements.txt
Run
python3 main.py \
--meshtastic-port /dev/ttyUSB0 \
--meshcore-port /dev/ttyUSB1 \
--reticulum-storage ./rns-storage
Use --meshtastic-host/--meshcore-host instead of the -port flags if a
board is reachable over TCP (e.g. an ESP32 WiFi build) instead of USB
serial. Run python3 main.py --help for the full flag list.
How relaying works
Each adapter pushes received text onto a shared, thread-safe queue
(bridge_core.MessageBus). A single dispatcher loop in main.py pulls
each message off, tags it with its origin network + sender, and re-sends
it on the other two networks — never back onto the network it came from.
Content-hash dedup (MessageBus.is_duplicate, 5-minute TTL by default)
stops the obvious relay loop (the bridge re-hearing its own relayed
copy). This is a known-simple v0 approach — it can't distinguish two
different messages that happen to have identical text within the TTL
window, and it doesn't help if there are multiple archy-messh bridges
active near each other. Good enough to prove the concept; revisit once
Phase 1 needs something more robust.
Known gaps (by design, for v0)
- Reticulum has no broadcast-channel primitive. Meshtastic has channel
PSKs, MeshCore has public channel indices — Reticulum/LXMF messaging is
point-to-point between Destinations.
ReticulumAdapterfakes broadcast by tracking a roster of peer delivery-destinations learned from their LXMF announces and fanning out to all of them individually. A shared symmetric-key ReticulumGROUPdestination would be a closer analog to a real channel — noted as a follow-up, not implemented here. - MeshCore channel messages carry no sender identity at the protocol
level (verified against
meshcore/reader.py—CHANNEL_MSG_RECVhas no pubkey/name field). MeshCore apps convey sender identity by convention inside the message text itself; this bridge doesn't attempt to parse that out, so messages relayed from MeshCore show?as the sender.