Files
archy/docs/paid-content-recovery-followup.md
T

173 lines
10 KiB
Markdown
Raw Normal View History

# Paid content: recovery before response headers
Status: OPEN, identified during IndeeHub rental integration on 2026-10-06.
This is a source-confirmed gap. No new real-money failure was induced.
## Confirmed boundaries
`api/rpc/content.rs::handle_content_download_peer_paid` checks the existing
purchase index and FIPS route before calling a wallet. It persists ownership
through `content_owned::record_purchase_stream` only after successful response
headers. Thus the previously qualified interrupted cached-body/seek cases do
not establish recovery during wallet preparation or after seller settlement but
before headers reach the buyer.
Cashu `send_token_at` may swap inputs remotely before saving the local wallet
and returning the prepared token. Its deterministic output derivation supports
wallet restoration, but is not a correlated purchase operation journal.
Concurrent mutations also need an operation-wide wallet reservation/commit
boundary, beyond the existing atomic file writer. Fedimint operation IDs and
out-of-band note recovery must be handled using that backend's actual semantics.
The seller currently redeems a presented token in `content_server::serve_content`
after preparing readable media. It does not persist a Cashu purchase receipt
that can authorize subsequent delivery without attempting redemption again.
A token hash alone is not evidence that redemption settled.
## Immediate correction being qualified
Choose the ecash backend before either wallet operation begins. An explicit
choice remains pinned; automatic selection reads the home-mint spendable Cashu
balance and selects Fedimint only when that balance is insufficient. Never fall
through to another wallet after an attempted operation returns an error: the
remote mint may already have consumed inputs. Reject unknown method names.
This prevents a second backend operation in the same RPC; it does **not** solve
crash recovery or make a fresh user retry safe.
## Required implementation and acceptance
1. Persist an unpredictable purchase ID and immutable seller/buyer/content/hash,
terms, amount, method and protocol capability before any mint/spend. A damaged
or ambiguous journal must block a second payment, preserving original data.
2. Journal wallet input reservations and recoverable output derivation/operation
IDs before a remote mutation. Commit wallet change, prepared token and operation
result durably. Serialize all competing wallet mutations, including receives,
melts and restores, without deadlocking nested operations.
3. Persist the seller's receipt/settlement transition. Recover ambiguous receipt
writes through correlated wallet operation results, not balance changes or
acceptance of the client's claimed outcome. Repeated delivery requests for
the same settled purchase must not redeem/pay again.
4. Bind delivery authorization to authenticated buyer and immutable content/terms,
with an unpredictable capability. Never turn a public on-chain address into
a bearer authorization credential. Negotiate updated peer capability; do not
assume old nodes implement this receipt protocol.
5. Retain prepared tokens privately until delivery or confirmed refund settles.
Record actual refunded amounts/fees. A failed refund is not proof of payment
failure and must not clear an ambiguous purchase for another charge.
6. Exercise interruption at every write/send/receipt boundary, duplicate requests,
process reconstruction, full restart, corrupt journal, disk-full, changed
offers, wrong buyer, incompatible peer, and mint/federation rejection. Prove
wallet conservation and one settlement with disposable deterministic fixtures
before bounded live payments. Keep rented cache authorization separate from
permanent paid-file ownership.
The existing two-node 1-sat purchases and cached-delivery tests remain valid for
their documented scope. They must not be relabeled as acceptance of these open
initial-payment/recovery requirements. No additional real payment is needed to
prove the immediate backend-selection regression.
## Backend-selection qualification
The immediate correction passes **12 focused content RPC tests**, including
injected ambiguous Cashu/Fedimint failures proving the unselected wallet future
is never polled, explicit-choice preservation and unknown-method rejection.
The full isolated suite passes **1,749 tests, zero failures, five existing
ignored tests**. Logs: `/tmp/archy-peer-payment-selection-tests.log` and
`/tmp/archy-peer-payment-selection-full-tests.log`. Only the required isolated
runner was used. No live wallet data or real payments were involved. This is
source/test qualification; production build and deployment are separate.
## Recovery-metadata prerequisite qualified (2026-10-06)
Seed reads now distinguish genuine absence from I/O failure. Loading a damaged
recovery source returns an error instead of silently enabling random outputs.
A configured recovery source must reserve/derive outputs successfully before a
mint request; derivation/counter failures no longer fall back to random secrets.
Legacy wallets which genuinely have no seed retain their existing output path.
Counter reservations reject empty/corrupt/unreadable existing files rather than
resetting to zero. Updates use an owner-only sibling temporary file, file flush,
atomic replacement and directory flush before returning a usable reservation.
Invalid derivation is rejected before reserving counters. Existing counter
serialization within the management process is preserved; this is not a claim
that a new cross-process wallet lock or the purchase journal has been implemented.
Six new regressions cover damaged seed/counter reads, preserved damaged files,
concurrent reservations/reload/private permissions/temp cleanup, invalid keysets,
no silent random-output fallback and explicit legacy behavior. Wallet-focused
isolated result:150passed,0failed,1existing ignored. Full isolated result:
**1,755passed,0failed,5existing ignored**. Evidence:
`/tmp/archy-wallet-recovery-prerequisites-tests.log` and
`/tmp/archy-wallet-recovery-prerequisites-full-tests.log`.
Read-only checks found well-shaped seed/counter JSON on dev and Yaya; no secret
values were printed and no wallet files were changed by those checks. Production
build/deployment of this prerequisite remains pending. Durable initial purchase
intent, mint-operation recovery, seller receipt and refund recovery remain open.
Strict-schema follow-up: an existing counter document must actually contain its
counter map. Empty JSON objects and null maps are rejected without modification,
not deserialized as a fresh zero state. The full isolated suite again passes
1,755tests,0failures,5existing ignored in
`/tmp/archy-wallet-recovery-strict-schema-full-tests.log`. No live deployment or
claim of complete initial-payment recovery is implied.
## Additional wallet boundaries found during review (6 October)
Source review of `ecash::melt_tokens`, `swap_between_mints` and
`MintClient::melt_tokens` found further work required before full recovery can
be accepted. The melt path does not currently submit or retain fee-change
outputs, and the caller does not require a PAID response before proceeding.
Cross-mint recovery records are written after the remote operation, leaving an
interruption window. These are source findings, not newly induced live losses.
The implementation must account for NUT-05 quote states and NUT-08 change using
the mint's advertised support, preserve uncertain operations, and verify amount
conservation. Reference specifications:
https://github.com/cashubtc/nuts/blob/main/05.md and
https://github.com/cashubtc/nuts/blob/main/08.md .
Wallet-wide serialization must also include network changes and streaming
revenue writes; a load/save outside the operation lock can overwrite another
mutation. Current empty-wallet-file handling, file permissions and directory
fsync require review as part of durable storage. Counter fail-closed tests do
not establish that this larger transaction journal has been implemented.
### Wallet storage durability follow-up
Existing empty/whitespace wallet files now fail closed instead of reporting zero;
only a missing file creates fresh state. Atomic saves use unique0600 temporary
files, file and directory fsync, and cleanup on failure. Concurrency tests prove
whole-file replacement (not read-modify-write serialization), private permissions
and retained targets on rename failure. Wallet tests:57passed. Full backend
qualification passes in `/tmp/archy-wallet-storage-tls-full-tests.log`. No live
wallet was altered. Operation serialization and recovery journal remain open.
### Serialized wallet mutations and seed durability
The wallet now serializes public mutations by canonical node data directory,
including network changes and seed establishment/import. Independent node
fixtures retain separate locks; nested send/swap paths use private implementations
under the outer lock. Streaming revenue records use the same boundary, and direct
wallet saves are restricted to the wallet module. This is in-process serialization,
not a cross-process transaction journal or a claim that an entire payment RPC is
recoverable.
Damaged network configuration now errors instead of silently choosing mainnet;
only an absent configuration retains the historical mainnet default. The previous
seed is durably copied to a unique private backup before atomic replacement,
rather than moved away before the replacement write succeeds.
Final isolated suite: **1,764 tests pass, zero failures, five existing skips**.
Log: /tmp/archy-wallet-mutation-seed-final-tests.log. Regressions include eight
simultaneous real HTTP/curve-signed fixture receipts plus sixteen history writes,
preserving255sats and24entries; canonical/symlink lock identity; damaged network
configuration; and simultaneous seed establishment/unique retained backups.
No live wallet data or additional real payments were used.
Still required: correlated purchase and mint-operation journal, recoverable
prepared outputs, quote/change handling and seller receipts, interrupted-operation
recovery and complete timed-playback integration. Higher-level Minibits claim and
purchase flows must pin their network/terms across their entire business operation;
serializing individual wallet calls alone does not provide that contract.