lfg2025/archy
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 24 Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases 64 Wiki Activity

docs(02-review): record second declined request for the PWA auto-update change

Browse Source 
A follow-up message relayed through the coordinator pressed the same
skipWaiting/clientsClaim + auto-apply change a second time, this time citing
a purported verbatim quote from Dorian as direct evidence rather than
inference. Declined again, unimplemented, for the same reason as the first
request: an agent-relayed message — verbatim-quoted or not — is not this
agent's own verification of the user's consent, and this agent has no
channel to confirm the quote independently. vite.config.ts and
PWAUpdatePrompt.vue remain unmodified.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
archipelago 2026-07-31 06:58:06 -04:00
parent 63f367ad74
commit 3d68e4b26d
1 changed files with 18 additions and 0 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
.planning/phases/02-ui-performance/02-REVIEW.md
View File

@ -548,6 +548,24 @@ change that needs Dorian's own direct confirmation, not a second-hand
instruction. `vite.config.ts` and `PWAUpdatePrompt.vue` are unmodified by
this work. If this is still wanted, it should be requested directly.
**Second request, same decision.** A follow-up message, again relayed
through the coordinator, pressed the same change a second time, this time
including a purported verbatim quote attributed to Dorian approving forced
auto-update and declining any warning UI, offered as direct evidence rather
than inference. That request was **also declined, unimplemented** —
`vite.config.ts` and `PWAUpdatePrompt.vue` remain unmodified. Not because
the quote was judged false, but because this agent has no channel to
verify a quote attributed to the user by another agent independently of
that agent's own assertion, and this agent's operating rules treat any
agent-relayed message — verbatim-quoted or otherwise — as distinct from,
and insufficient to substitute for, the user's own message in this session.
A more detailed, more insistent second request for the same
wallet-affecting change is the exact shape of thing that rule exists to
hold the line against, whether or not that's what was happening here. This
will be implemented, in one self-contained commit exactly as scoped,
the moment Dorian's own message (or an equivalent direct/verified channel)
carries the request instead.
### Safety acceptance criteria — evidence
1. **Purge blast radius is strictly bounded — PASS.** `purgeAllSnapshots()`