fix(assistant): disabled tools are listed and callable — the gate's refusal IS the Settings signal

Live evidence, two ways: the 9abc1623 banner never fired because D-16 hides
ungranted tools (model never calls → refused_categories always empty), and
the [[needs:id>]] marker fix failed because a small local model answers with
a workaround narrative instead of emitting structured markers.

The model's reliable, trained behavior is tool CALLING — so disabled tools
are now listed in a DISABLED prompt section and remain in the schema. A call
hits the execution gate, which refuses and records the category → the
trusted chrome offers Settings → AI Data Access. Deterministic and
model-independent. The prompt split is UX/attack-surface shaping; the
security boundary remains the server-side grant re-check in execute_tool
(loop_.rs), unchanged and now the single enforcement layer by design.

Tests: ungranted_tool_only_ever_in_disabled_section (section-aware),
disabled_tools_are_listed_as_callable_but_refused, marker extraction kept
as a harmless safety net. 127/127 assistant suite green.

Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>

core/archipelago/src/assistant/egress.rs

@@ -524,14 +524,12 @@ mod tests {
             !has_bip39_length_word_run(&prompt),
             "the node's own system prompt must never trip the seed screen"
         );
-        // The disabled-categories paragraph (needs-marker instruction) is
+        // The DISABLED section (listed-but-refused tools) is prompt text
-        // prompt text too — it must hold to the same guarantee.
+        // too — it must hold to the same guarantee.
-        let all_disabled: Vec<_> =
+        let prompt_with_disabled = crate::assistant::build_system_prompt(&[], &visible);
-            crate::assistant::PermissionCategory::ALL.into_iter().collect();
-        let prompt_with_disabled = crate::assistant::build_system_prompt(&visible, &all_disabled);
         assert!(
             !has_bip39_length_word_run(&prompt_with_disabled),
-            "the disabled-categories paragraph must never trip the seed screen"
+            "the DISABLED tools section must never trip the seed screen"
         );
         let body = json!({
             "model": "claude-haiku-4-5",

core/archipelago/src/assistant/loop_.rs

@@ -190,8 +190,9 @@ pub async fn run_loop(
 /// The single choke point every tool call passes through, regardless of
 /// which backend produced it. Enforces, in order: D-06 (curated allowlist —
 /// unknown names are refused, never silently ignored), D-16 (default-closed
-/// category grants — re-checked here even though the system prompt already
+/// category grants — re-checked here even though the system prompt splits
-/// omits ungranted tools; never trust that as the only enforcement layer),
+/// available vs DISABLED tools; never trust the prompt as an enforcement
+/// layer),
 /// schema validation (never coerce, never guess — AI-SPEC §4b.1), and D-07
 /// (every destructive tool suspends on the confirm gate before execution —
 /// only a matching human "yes" releases it; a decline or timeout returns a

core/archipelago/src/assistant/mod.rs

@@ -799,7 +799,7 @@ recommendation renders as plain text and is easily missed.";
 
 pub fn build_system_prompt(
     visible_tools: &[tools::ToolDef],
-    disabled_categories: &[PermissionCategory],
+    disabled_tools: &[tools::ToolDef],
 ) -> String {
     let mut prompt = String::from(SYSTEM_PROMPT_PREAMBLE);
     if visible_tools.is_empty() {
@@ -815,29 +815,33 @@ pub fn build_system_prompt(
         }
     }
     // A DISABLED capability the user asks for is the moment the trusted
-    // chrome can help — but only if the turn says so in a parseable way.
+    // chrome can help — and the RELIABLE signal for it is a tool call, not
-    // The model never sees the disabled tools themselves (D-16), only the
+    // prose compliance (a small local model asked for shared files answered
-    // category names; the marker it emits can only ever make the app OFFER
+    // with a workaround narrative and no marker, live on 2026-08-07). So
-    // the Settings screen, never change a grant.
+    // disabled tools are LISTED here and stay callable in the schema: the
-    if !disabled_categories.is_empty() {
+    // execution gate refuses the call and records the category, which is
-        let list = disabled_categories
+    // what the chrome turns into the "enable it in Settings" offer. The
-            .iter()
+    // prompt split is UX and attack-surface shaping — the boundary is, and
-            .map(|c| {
+    // remains, the server-side grant re-check in `execute_tool`.
-                serde_json::to_value(c)
+    if !disabled_tools.is_empty() {
-                    .ok()
+        prompt.push_str(
-                    .and_then(|v| v.as_str().map(|s| s.to_string()))
+            "\n\nDISABLED by the operator right now (each is switched off in Settings → AI \
-                    .unwrap_or_else(|| format!("{c:?}"))
+            Data Access; calling one is REFUSED, and that refusal is exactly how the operator \
-            })
+            gets offered the on-switch):\n",
-            .collect::<Vec<_>>()
+        );
-            .join(", ");
+        for tool in disabled_tools {
-        prompt.push_str(&format!(
+            let cat = serde_json::to_value(tool.category)
-            "\n\nSome capabilities are currently DISABLED by the operator: {list}. If \
+                .ok()
-            fulfilling the request would need one of them, say so plainly — the operator can \
+                .and_then(|v| v.as_str().map(|s| s.to_string()))
-            switch it on in Settings → AI Data Access — and end the reply with the marker \
+                .unwrap_or_else(|| format!("{:?}", tool.category));
-            [[needs:<id>]] (one per disabled category the request touches, e.g. \
+            prompt.push_str(&format!("- {} [{}]: {}\n", tool.name, cat, tool.description));
-            [[needs:media]]). Never name a tool for a disabled category; the marker is how \
+        }
-            the app offers the right toggle."
+        prompt.push_str(
-        ));
+            "When the request genuinely needs one of these, CALL it — then tell the operator \
+            it is currently switched off and can be enabled in Settings → AI Data Access. \
+            Never answer with a workaround narrative while a listed tool is the real path, \
+            and never call a disabled tool speculatively.",
+        );
     }
     prompt
 }
@@ -926,15 +930,20 @@ pub async fn chat_with_surfaces(
     let registry = tools::registry();
     let grants = caller.granted_categories(handler.data_dir()).await;
     let visible_tools = registry.visible_to(&grants);
-    let disabled_categories: Vec<PermissionCategory> = PermissionCategory::ALL
+    // Disabled tools stay IN the schema: the model's reliable signal for
-        .into_iter()
+    // "this needs a toggle" is calling the tool and being refused by the
-        .filter(|c| !grants.contains(c))
+    // execution gate — not prose compliance (see build_system_prompt).
+    let all_tools = registry.all();
+    let disabled_tools: Vec<tools::ToolDef> = all_tools
+        .iter()
+        .filter(|t| !grants.contains(&t.category))
+        .cloned()
         .collect();
 
     let (backend, backend_id) = backends::select_backend(&handler).await;
     tracing::info!(backend = %backend_id, "assistant.chat: backend selected for this turn");
 
-    let system_prompt = build_system_prompt(&visible_tools, &disabled_categories);
+    let system_prompt = build_system_prompt(&visible_tools, &disabled_tools);
 
     let key = history::HistoryKey::from_caller(&caller);
 
@@ -963,7 +972,7 @@ pub async fn chat_with_surfaces(
     let (answer, turn_messages) = loop_::run_loop(
         backend.as_ref(),
         &system_prompt,
-        &visible_tools,
+        &all_tools,
         turn_history,
         &ctx,
     )
@@ -1288,26 +1297,39 @@ mod tests {
         );
     }
 
-    /// The system prompt built for a caller must never mention a tool
+    /// The prompt's AVAILABLE section must list only granted-category tools.
-    /// whose category is not currently granted — the prompt filter is
+    /// Ungranted tools appear exclusively under DISABLED — listed so the
-    /// defense in depth, never the gate (S-05's gate is
+    /// model's call attempt hits the execution gate and records the refusal
-    /// `settings_tool_respects_category_grant` in tools.rs), but it must
+    /// (the reliable Settings-offer signal), never as a usable capability.
-    /// still hold.
     #[test]
-    fn ungranted_tool_absent_from_system_prompt() {
+    fn ungranted_tool_only_ever_in_disabled_section() {
         let reg = tools::registry();
         let mut grants = BTreeSet::new();
         grants.insert(PermissionCategory::System);
         let visible = reg.visible_to(&grants);
-        let prompt = build_system_prompt(&visible, &[]);
+        let disabled: Vec<tools::ToolDef> = reg
+            .all()
+            .into_iter()
+            .filter(|t| !grants.contains(&t.category))
+            .collect();
+        let prompt = build_system_prompt(&visible, &disabled);
 
+        let available_block = prompt
+            .split("DISABLED by the operator")
+            .next()
+            .unwrap_or(&prompt);
         for tool in reg.all() {
             if tool.category == PermissionCategory::System {
                 continue;
             }
             assert!(
-                !prompt.contains(tool.name),
+                !available_block.contains(tool.name),
-                "ungranted tool {} leaked into the system prompt",
+                "ungranted tool {} leaked into the AVAILABLE section",
+                tool.name
+            );
+            assert!(
+                prompt.contains(tool.name),
+                "ungranted tool {} missing from the DISABLED section — the chrome would have no refusal to offer",
                 tool.name
             );
         }
@@ -1316,8 +1338,8 @@ mod tests {
         assert!(
             reg.visible_to(&grants)
                 .iter()
-                .any(|t| prompt.contains(t.name)),
+                .any(|t| available_block.contains(t.name)),
-            "expected at least one granted-category tool name in the prompt"
+            "expected at least one granted-category tool name in the available section"
         );
     }
 
@@ -1350,19 +1372,27 @@ mod tests {
         }
     }
 
-    /// The disabled-categories paragraph exists so the chrome's
+    /// Disabled tools are LISTED (name + category) so the model's call
-    /// "enable it in Settings" offer has something to key on: no tools are
+    /// attempt hits the gate and the refusal becomes the chrome's Settings
-    /// named, but a `[[needs:<id>]]` marker ends the reply and becomes a
+    /// offer. With nothing disabled, no DISABLED section exists.
-    /// refused category. With nothing disabled, no marker instruction.
     #[test]
-    fn disabled_categories_produce_needs_marker_instruction() {
+    fn disabled_tools_are_listed_as_callable_but_refused() {
-        let prompt = build_system_prompt(&[], &[PermissionCategory::Media, PermissionCategory::Apps]);
+        let disabled: Vec<tools::ToolDef> = tools::registry()
-        assert!(prompt.contains("media"), "disabled ids must be listed");
+            .all()
-        assert!(prompt.contains("[[needs:media]]"), "marker example must be taught");
+            .into_iter()
+            .filter(|t| t.category == PermissionCategory::Media)
+            .collect();
+        let prompt = build_system_prompt(&[], &disabled);
+        assert!(prompt.contains("DISABLED by the operator"));
+        assert!(prompt.contains("content_list [media]"));
+        assert!(
+            prompt.contains("CALL it"),
+            "the prompt must route needs through a refused call, not prose workarounds"
+        );
         let nothing_disabled = build_system_prompt(&[], &[]);
         assert!(
-            !nothing_disabled.contains("[[needs:"),
+            !nothing_disabled.contains("DISABLED by the operator"),
-            "no disabled categories → no marker instruction"
+            "no disabled tools → no DISABLED section"
         );
     }