With registry push access, the 24 mirror-backed apps stopped being
blocked. Ten images are now mirrored (single-platform amd64, matching
the existing convention) and their pins moved:
alby-hub v1.23.0 -> v1.24.0
mempool-frontend v3.0.1 -> v3.3.1 (mempool, archy-mempool-web)
mempool-backend v3.0.0 -> v3.3.1
fedimintd v0.10.0 -> v0.10.1
gatewayd v0.10.0 -> v0.10.1
nostr-rs-relay 0.9.0 -> 0.10.0
portainer 2.39.1 -> 2.39.6
vaultwarden 1.30.0-alpine -> 1.37.1-alpine
jellyfin 10.8.13 -> 10.11.11
home-assistant 2026.7.3 -> 2026.8.2
Every one verified pullable from our mirror after copying, so none can
become an image-not-found on a node. image-versions.sh moved in lockstep
— it is the baseline the update badge compares against when the catalog
does not cover an app, and leaving it behind would have kept advertising
an update that had already been applied.
Chosen by risk, not by count: these are patch/minor bumps with no data
migration. The ones held back are held for a reason each — Postgres
15->18 and 16->18 refuse to start on an older cluster, Redis 7->8,
Valkey 7->9, Nextcloud 29->32 must go one major at a time, plus
uptime-kuma 1->2, grafana 10->13, electrumx 1->2, photoprism, and
core-lightning's three years of schema migrations. Those are each a
migration plan, not a pin edit. LND (v0.18.4 -> v0.21.2) is held
separately: it is only a minor bump by version but it migrates its
channel database irreversibly, and this box holds real funds.
Note the checker still reports several of these as behind, and that is
correct: it reads the *catalog* pin, which is what nodes actually act on.
These land when the catalog is regenerated and re-signed.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Nodes offer an update when the signed catalog pins something newer than
what's running, and that machinery is fine. The missing step was the one
before it: nothing told *us* when upstream shipped. A pin could sit at
fedimintd v0.10.0 for months while every node in the fleet correctly and
confidently reported "up to date".
The reason nothing could tell us is that a manifest records only our
mirror — `source.archipelago-foundation.org/lfg2025/fedimintd:v0.10.0`
says nothing about the project it was mirrored from. So this adds an
optional `app.upstream` block naming the real source, and a script that
asks each one what it has released.
Running it answers the question that prompted this. Of 58 apps, 28 are
behind, including LND v0.18.4-beta against v0.21.2-beta, Bitcoin Core
28.4 against 31.1, and fedimintd/gatewayd v0.10.0 against v0.10.1.
Two choices worth stating. An app with no `upstream` block is reported
as UNTRACKED rather than skipped — a silent skip is how this stayed
invisible, and before this commit all 58 were silently skipped. And a
suggestion prefers our own tag variant: telling someone pinned to
`postgres:16.13-alpine` that the newest tag is `18.6-trixie` is true and
useless, because swapping the base image is a different decision from
bumping a version.
Five apps are deliberately left untracked (barkd, immich-postgres,
indeedhub-minio, lightning-stack, pine-whisper): I could not establish
their upstream with confidence, and a wrong `repo` produces a confident
wrong verdict, which is worse than an honest gap.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
