The 2026-07-23 status block lists as DONE: "Deleted: Courier_New/, Benton_Sans/,
Redacted/ fonts; wireguard.apk; atob.s9pk; obsolete test-install.sh (all
git-rm'd)". All seven are still tracked at HEAD and present on disk. Only the
web/dist copies went; the sources never did.
git ls-tree -r HEAD --name-only | grep -iE 'Courier_New|Benton_Sans|Redacted/|wireguard.apk|atob.s9pk'
That means a repo about to be published under MIT still carries a commercial
Font Bureau typeface and two proprietary Monotype fonts — precisely what §3 of
this audit says must not ship. An audit that reports a blocker as closed is
worse than one that never checked, so the entry is now struck through with the
file list and the verification command inline.
Deleting them is safe and I checked before saying so: nothing references the
font *files* (the three `Courier New` hits are CSS font-family fallbacks naming
the system font, not @font-face sources), and wireguard.apk / atob.s9pk have
zero references anywhere in the tree. Left the deletion itself to the operator —
it is 40 MB of tracked binaries and outside a docs pass. Removing them also
takes 40 MB off the frontend OTA tarball, which is a separate open item.
Also re-verified the rest of the remaining list:
- `zbase32` (LGPL-3.0+) is still a direct dep (Cargo.toml:113, did_dht.rs:40,49).
Still the only hard copyleft blocker.
- LICENSE (MIT), NOTICE and both THIRD-PARTY-LICENSES inventories are present —
so the headline "no license of its own" is closed; softened the verdict to say
which blockers remain rather than leaving a stale "not releasable as-is".
- The four StartOS-derived crates still exist; flagged that KEY-05 cites
core/models, so that one needs review rather than a blind delete.
- Item 6 (git filter-repo history purge) is superseded — the launch plan is a
fresh-history publish, so there is no history to rewrite.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Archipelago documentation
Start here. This index groups the docs by what you're trying to do. The
authoritative behaviour is always the code in core/; where a doc and the code
disagree, the code wins and the doc is a bug.
Getting started
- User Walkthrough — setting up and using a node, from hardware to daily use
- Talking to your node — the conversational command surface
- Seed Verification — independently verify your 24-word backup
- Troubleshooting — common problems and how to resolve them
- Gamepad / Controller Navigation — driving the UI from a controller
- Pine voice commands — the voice-satellite phrase surface
Architecture
- Architecture — the system at a glance
- Multi-Node Architecture — how nodes relate across a fleet
- API Reference — the JSON-RPC surface
Contributing to Archipelago itself
- Developer Guide — building the workspace, the frontend, and an ISO
- Contributor guide (
CLAUDE.md) — invariants, build/verify, the production test gate - Bulletproof containers — why the reconciler is level-triggered
- Release signing runbook — the ceremony and key handling
- 1.8.0 Release Hardening Plan — the release-blocking checklist
- Third-party license audit — dependency licensing posture
- Demo build info — operating the public demo sandbox
App development
- App Developer Guide — build and package a containerized app
- App Manifest Specification — the manifest schema, field by field
- Manifest → Quadlet unit — how a manifest compiles to a systemd-owned container unit
- Container lifecycle — the reconciler state machine: install/adopt/start/stop/self-heal
- App secrets — declaring, generating and injecting per-install credentials
- Registry-Distributed Manifests — how manifests reach nodes via the signed catalog
- Decentralized Marketplace Protocol — publishing apps via an external registry
- Bitcoin RPC Relay — letting an external wallet reach the node's Bitcoin RPC
- Companion Pairing QR — the pairing handoff contract
- TV input inside iframe apps — keyboard/gamepad routing into embedded apps
Design docs
These record why a thing is built the way it is. They are design records, not step-by-step guides, and some predate the current implementation.
- Registry-Distributed Manifests
- DHT Distribution
- Bitcoin Multi-Version
- Dual Ecash
- Hardware Signer
- Manifest Hooks
- Meshroller Integration
- Nostr Git Source Hosting
- Nostr Identity Import · Nostr Signer Login (research)
- Streaming Ecash (phase 4)
- App Packaging Migration
Decisions (ADRs)
- ADR-001: Podman over Docker
- ADR-002: DID Key Method for Node Identity
- ADR-003: Nostr Relays for Discovery
- ADR-004: Tor Hidden Services for Peer Communication
- ADR-005: ChaCha20-Poly1305 for Backup Encryption
- ADR-006: Nostr Relays for Marketplace Discovery
- ADR-007: DID-Based Federation Trust
- ADR-008: Dual Key Strategy (Ed25519 + Secp256k1)
- ADR-009: Manifest-Level Container Security
- ADR-011: DWN Deprioritization
There is no ADR-010 — the number was never issued, so the gap is not a missing file.
Security
- Security Policy — how to report a vulnerability
- PSBT Signing Architecture
- Bitcoin RPC Proxy Exposure
- Entropy Enforcement (KEY-05)