Demo images / Build & push demo images (push) Successful in 3m16s
Creating a Lightning invoice with no Lightning implementation installed failed
at the RPC layer — lnd.createinvoice returned connection-refused and the
Receive screen rendered it as a red error. That reads as the wallet being
broken when the node simply has no Lightning node installed yet.
useLightningRequired() gates the three invoice paths (wallet Receive, the Web5
send/receive sheet, and the app launcher's paywall — both arms there, since
paying an invoice needs a node as much as minting one). With none installed it
raises a modal offering to install one and the caller bails without surfacing
an error at all.
The modal lists the choice rather than assuming LND: LND installs today, Core
Lightning is listed greyed as "Coming soon" so the platform doesn't read as
LND-only. When CLN ships it is two lines — flip `available` and add the id to
LIGHTNING_NODE_APP_IDS.
Detection is install state, NOT reachability, deliberately: an installed node
that is merely stopped or still starting is a different problem ("start it")
and must not be answered with "install a Lightning node".
Also fixes the credentials modal, which painted its own rgba(8,10,18,.98)
navy card instead of the house glass-card — it read as blue against every
other modal. It existed twice (Apps.vue and apps/AppIconGrid.vue); both now
use BaseModal, so they also inherit Esc/focus handling, body scroll lock and
the standard pinned-header/footer scroll contract they were missing. Dead
panel CSS removed from both.
Verified: 4 new tests; full suite 103 files / 826 tests green; npm run build
clean with the new strings present in the built bundle.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
62 lines
2.1 KiB
TypeScript
62 lines
2.1 KiB
TypeScript
import { describe, it, expect, beforeEach, vi } from 'vitest'
|
|
import { createPinia, setActivePinia } from 'pinia'
|
|
import { useLightningRequired } from '../useLightningRequired'
|
|
|
|
// The gate reads install state off the app store's package list. Stub the
|
|
// store rather than the RPC layer so the test pins the decision, not the
|
|
// transport.
|
|
const packages = vi.hoisted(() => ({ value: {} as Record<string, unknown> }))
|
|
vi.mock('@/stores/app', () => ({
|
|
useAppStore: () => ({
|
|
get packages() {
|
|
return packages.value
|
|
},
|
|
}),
|
|
}))
|
|
|
|
describe('useLightningRequired', () => {
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
setActivePinia(createPinia())
|
|
packages.value = {}
|
|
// Module-scope `show` is shared by design (one global modal), so reset it
|
|
// between cases or the first opener leaks into the next test.
|
|
useLightningRequired().close()
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('lets the action through when a Lightning node is installed', () => {
|
|
packages.value = { lnd: {}, 'bitcoin-knots': {} }
|
|
const lightning = useLightningRequired()
|
|
|
|
expect(lightning.hasLightningNode()).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(lightning.requireLightningNode()).toBe(true)
|
|
expect(lightning.show.value).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('blocks and raises the install modal when no Lightning node is installed', () => {
|
|
packages.value = { 'bitcoin-knots': {}, immich: {} }
|
|
const lightning = useLightningRequired()
|
|
|
|
expect(lightning.hasLightningNode()).toBe(false)
|
|
// Returns false so the caller bails WITHOUT surfacing an error string —
|
|
// that was the whole defect: a missing prerequisite rendered as a failure.
|
|
expect(lightning.requireLightningNode()).toBe(false)
|
|
expect(lightning.show.value).toBe(true)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('shares one modal state across call sites', () => {
|
|
packages.value = {}
|
|
const a = useLightningRequired()
|
|
const b = useLightningRequired()
|
|
|
|
a.requireLightningNode()
|
|
expect(b.show.value).toBe(true)
|
|
b.close()
|
|
expect(a.show.value).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
it('treats an empty package list as no Lightning node', () => {
|
|
packages.value = {}
|
|
expect(useLightningRequired().hasLightningNode()).toBe(false)
|
|
})
|
|
})
|