Two concrete, verifiable documentation gaps from the open-source review:
- docs/ had no index. Adds docs/README.md grouping the 60-odd published docs by
task — getting started, architecture, app development, design docs, ADRs,
security, roadmap — in the bitcoin/bitcoin doc/ style the plan called for.
Every link in it resolves (checked). The top-level README now points at it as
the front door rather than duplicating the list.
- ROADMAP.md and tests/lifecycle/TESTING.md linked docs/multinode-testing-plan.md,
which moved to local-only (it is a fleet node inventory, not published). Those
references now describe the scope split in prose instead of pointing at a file
that is not in the public tree.
The index is honest about what is missing: it names the three app-developer
docs the plan flagged as gaps (quadlet compilation, container lifecycle,
secrets materialisation) as not-yet-written, and points at the authoritative
code for each rather than pretending they exist.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
