archipelagoandClaude Opus 5
eb48eab946
Nodes offer an update when the signed catalog pins something newer than what's running, and that machinery is fine. The missing step was the one before it: nothing told *us* when upstream shipped. A pin could sit at fedimintd v0.10.0 for months while every node in the fleet correctly and confidently reported "up to date". The reason nothing could tell us is that a manifest records only our mirror — `source.archipelago-foundation.org/lfg2025/fedimintd:v0.10.0` says nothing about the project it was mirrored from. So this adds an optional `app.upstream` block naming the real source, and a script that asks each one what it has released. Running it answers the question that prompted this. Of 58 apps, 28 are behind, including LND v0.18.4-beta against v0.21.2-beta, Bitcoin Core 28.4 against 31.1, and fedimintd/gatewayd v0.10.0 against v0.10.1. Two choices worth stating. An app with no `upstream` block is reported as UNTRACKED rather than skipped — a silent skip is how this stayed invisible, and before this commit all 58 were silently skipped. And a suggestion prefers our own tag variant: telling someone pinned to `postgres:16.13-alpine` that the newest tag is `18.6-trixie` is true and useless, because swapping the base image is a different decision from bumping a version. Five apps are deliberately left untracked (barkd, immich-postgres, indeedhub-minio, lightning-stack, pine-whisper): I could not establish their upstream with confidence, and a wrong `repo` produces a confident wrong verdict, which is worse than an honest gap. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>